This document is a translation. 
              In the event of any discrepancies in interpreting the terminology, the Polish language version is binding.     4 
 
Responsibilities of the Bank’s Management and Supervisory Board for the Financial Statements 
The Management Board of the Bank is responsible for the preparation, based on properly  maintained 
accounting  records,  of  the  financial  statements  reflect  fairy  and  clearly  the  assets  and  financial 
position of the Bank and its  result in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as 
adopted  by  the  European  Union,  the  adopted  accounting  policies,  the  legal  regulations  binding  the 
Bank,  and  its  Article  of  Association,  as  well  as  for  internal  controls  which  the  Management  Board 
considers  to  be  necessary  to  prepare  financial  statements  which  do  not  include  any  material 
misstatements caused by fraud or error. 
In preparing the financial statements, the Management Board of the Bank is responsible for assessing 
the Bank’s ability to continue as a going concern, for the disclosure, if necessary, any matters related 
to its going concern and for adopting the going concern principle as the basis of accounting, except in 
situations when the Management Board of the Bank either intends to liquidate the Bank or discontinue 
its operations, or has no real alternative to liquidation or discontinuation of operations. 
The Management Board and members of its Supervisory Board of the Bank are obliged to ensure that 
the  financial  statements  comply  with  the  requirements  of  the  Accounting  Act.  Members  of  the 
Supervisory Board are responsible for overseeing the Bank’s financial reporting process.  
Responsibilities of the Auditor for the Audit of the Financial Statements 
Our aim is to gain reasonable assurance that the financial statements as a whole are free from material 
misstatements  due  to  fraud  or  error,  and  to  issue  an  audit  report  which  includes  our  opinion. 
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but it does not guarantee that the audit conducted 
in accordance with NSA will always detect an existing material misstatement. Misstatements can arise 
from fraud or error and are considered material if it could be reasonably expected that, individually or 
in the aggregate, they could affect the business decisions of users, made on the basis of these financial 
statements. 
The concept of materiality is  applied by the auditor at the  planning  stage  and when performing the 
audit  and  evaluating  the  effect  of  identified  misstatements  on  the  audit  and  of  uncorrected 
misstatements, if any, on the financial statements, as well as when formulating the auditor’s opinion. 
In view of the above, all of the opinions and statements contained in the auditor’s report are expressed 
subject to the qualitative and quantitative level of materiality set in accordance with the applicable 
standards on auditing and the auditor’s professional judgement. 
The scope of the audit does not include assurance of the Bank’s future profitability or the current or 
future effectiveness of managing all matters by the Bank’s Management Board. 
Throughout  an  audit  performed  in  accordance  with  NSA,  we  apply  professional  judgement  and 
professional skepticism, as well as: 
−  we identify and assess the risks of a material misstatement in the financial statements due to fraud 
or error, we  design and conduct audit procedures in response to those  risks, and we obtain audit 
evidence  that  is  sufficient  and  appropriate  to  provide  a  basis  for  our  opinion.  The  risk  of  non-
detection of a material misstatement which is result of fraud is higher than that resulting from an 
error  because  fraud  may  relate  to  conspiracy,  falsification,  intentional  omission,  misleading  or 
overriding internal controls; 
−  we  obtain  an  understanding  of  the  internal  controls  relevant  to  the  audit  in  order  to  design  our 
audit  procedures  suitable  in  the  given  circumstances,  but  not  to  express  an  opinion  on  the 
effectiveness of the Bank’s internal controls;  
−  we  assess  the  appropriateness  of  the  accounting  policies  applied  and  the  reasonableness  of  the 
accounting estimates and related disclosures made by the Management Board of the Bank; 
−  we reach a conclusion as to the appropriateness of the Bank’s Management Board application of the 
going concern principle as the basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence collected, we 
assess  whether  there  is  material  uncertainty  related  to  events  or  conditions  that  may  raise